https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=166641
--- Comment #5 from Eyal Rozenberg <[email protected]> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3) Thanks for taking the time. I'll first ask for a screenshot in Light mode rather than dark mode. Doesn't have to be all tabs, just the home tab is fine. Generally, I like it! However... Label formatting: * Italicizing the labels is not useful. Reduces readability, and looks kind of weird; italic font is for running text rather than labels IMNSHO, I don't believe we use those anywhere else. * MS Office uses the same font family and size for section labels and for command lables / text box text. We could do the same; or - we could choose to make it another point or half-point smaller. * MS Office leaves a generous padding between the ribbon bottom and the section label, and so have you. I am ok with this, but we could also consider reducing that padding somewhat. Choice of section titles: * "Find and Replace" does not fit in a "New" section. * The "Style" section only contains paragraph styles; should we not call it "Paragraph Style" or "Paragraph Styles"? * Inserting media does not fit into a "Graphic"-labeled section. * "Page Numbers" is not that much of a tools. But - ok, I can live with it. * The "References" tab has a "References" section. Problematic. * "Footnote" and "Endnote" are not references. When you insert these, references to them are also introduced, but still; so don't fit into a "References" section. * "Data Sources" and "Bibliographic Database" don't fit well in a "Fields" section. * The "Accept Changes" section could just as well be named "Reject Changes" - and both names ignore the other aspect. Perhaps "Change Actions"? Hmmm. * The Image tab "Tools" section - with commands for changing contrast and brightness etc. - seems too vague of a choice of name. Maybe "Adjust" or "Adjustment"? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
