https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=56076

--- Comment #21 from Yury <yury.tarasiev...@gmail.com> ---
I'm still very unconvinced (but have it your own way, of course).

I do NOT believe I ought to have to hand-tune lots of fonts in a config file
having obscure and convoluted format in order just to get a sensible font face
substitution (is it the same on Windows and Mac, BTW?). If I add a font, do I
have to do this again?

I knew what fc-match would show, of course. The point is such use of the
fontconfig engine can show only the output of the built-in rules (which, yes,
would give fallback to DejaVuSans on almost all linux systems out-of-the-box).
While (obviously?) the problem I'm talking should be solved by more accurate
use of the fontconfig engine (there IS such API in fontconfig, isn't there?)

I might yet agree to the need for editing fontconfigs in order to get a
SPECIFIC substitution (glyph from the specific face), although that's also has
too much of an 1980s-style usability.

If only somebody directed me to the code doing the fontconfig match request,
I'd just attempt to make this mod for myself.

***

> > > > Why're the bitmapped fonts excluded from being UI font, BTW?
> > > 
> > > Ditto.
> > 
> > There are no raster fonts in list of choices in the fonts substitution
> > dialog (where one may choose a replacement for Andale Sans UI or Segoe UI
> > faces).
> 
> Do you have such fonts in a format that LibreOffice can use (e.g. not in X
> bitmap format which I think support for it was long dropped). I admit I
> don’t know much about that dialog and how it works internally, so I’m just
> speculating here.

I have such fonts installed in format which every other multi-platofrm
application on my system is capable of using (there are BDFs and PCFs). Not
LibO, though.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to