https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=72628
--- Comment #27 from Jorendc <jore...@libreoffice.org> --- (In reply to comment #26) > I never understood the bibisect output, but I assume those are the suspected > source tree commits, right? (they all seem to be OUString conversion > commits). Indeed. I spoke with Norbert and Michael S. today on IRC, related to this bibisect. Looks like I bibisected the turnover in behavior. The oldest possible LibreOffice-version in the Mac OSX bibisect package doesn't export _any_ text, so I made the assumption the behavior was 'good', to bibisect further. The next bibisection 'good' and 'bad' is made on the fact the export is exporting the font as in version 4.1 (see attachment 'LO 4.1 PDF output'). During the whole bibisect there was no correct behavior (same exported font, as font in editor/Writer). The 'good' behavior I bibisected was: "Wrong in editor, correct in pdf export" 'bad': "correct in editor, wrong in pdf export". So, my bibisection is incorrect and just shows the turn-over point from 'good' and 'bad' behavior as described above. I'm sorry for the confusion -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
