https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77484
a07cd040897db54e1...@spambog.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|NOTABUG |---
--- Comment #6 from a07cd040897db54e1...@spambog.com ---
> I am very sorry for this noise, but this is expected behaviour (if you think
> about it): Borders are, in the same way as the page margains drawn at the
> real (natural) borders of the page. A tabulator with 5cm is content right?
> Add 2 cm for the "Space to the content" from the border and you got the 7cm.
> So, it is desired behaviour....
If you only think about it theoretically and light-minded you seem to be right,
that the spacing should be added to the page margins. But if you think about it
once more, you will see that the current behaviour ob setting tabstopps (by
clicking the ruler) produces unexpected results.
It should never be "desired behaviour" to produce unexpected results (even if
technically everything seems to be right).
You can turn it as you want: Either the calculation of the spacing is correct,
then setting the tabstopps is erroneous. Or you might argue that creating the
tabstopps ist correct, then the calculation of the spacing must be erroneous.
Currently the calculation of the spacing and the function to set the tabstopps
do *NOT* fit together.
I feel that the first case applies and the function to set tabstopps is wrong
'cause it does not expect that a border spacing > 0 can exist.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
