https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=77479
a07cd040897db54e1...@spambog.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|WORKSFORME |---
Ever confirmed|0 |1
--- Comment #5 from a07cd040897db54e1...@spambog.com ---
Hi Sophie,
> why do you want to apply the Sort function when it's already part of the
> Autofilter function. You use the first one to only sort and the second one
> to sort and filter, for me it works as it is supposed to. Set as worksforme
What you describe is a workaround that prevents the error from occuring by
changing the way to operate the data. This is not a solution to the described
problem.
Why your suggestion is NOT the same as the intended workflow:
1. imagine a list of lets say 10.000 lines that are not sorted (or may be
sorted a special way you dont know)
2. the unaffected rows (the ones that are not selected by the filter) must stay
at their positions
How would you meet these requirements with your strategy?
Can you reproduce the reported behaviour with the workflow described (filter
first, sort second)?
Do you think that the current behaviour is expected by the user and should
remain unchanged?
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
