https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=66701
Michael Meeks <michael.me...@collabora.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |markus.mohrhard@googlemail. | |com, | |michael.me...@collabora.com --- Comment #19 from Michael Meeks <michael.me...@collabora.com> --- Looks like this: boost::scoped_ptr<HASHContext> hc(HASH_Create(HASH_AlgSHA1)); vs. the explicit destroy: HASH_End(hc.get(), digest.data, &digest.len, SHA1_LENGTH); HASH_Destroy(hc.get()); is the basic problem - a double free - ho hum; nice to use scoped_ptr of course - but not really with a C-style structure like this (I suspect). Looks like it crept in here: commit d73c039fa5353f0b96026bed4a0da31d9a41d2c7 Author: Markus Mohrhard <markus.mohrh...@googlemail.com> Date: Thu Sep 5 15:17:08 2013 +0200 CID#1078782: fix memory leak -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs