https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=75215
--- Comment #5 from Owen Genat <owen.ge...@gmail.com> --- Created attachment 106205 --> https://bugs.freedesktop.org/attachment.cgi?id=106205&action=edit FODT using an automatic (rather than common) style definition. It would seem this report may relate to whether ruby text is considered a common (<office:styles>) or automatic (<office:automatic-styles>) style by the LO implementation. ODF v1.2, Part 1, ยง3.15.3 states: > Common and automatic styles behave differently in OpenDocument editing > consumers. > Common styles are presented to the user as a named set of formatting > properties. > The formatting properties of an automatic style are presented to a user as > properties of the object to which the style is applied. In attachment 94368 the ruby text is defined by a bare <text:ruby> element that relies on this default (common) style definition: > <style:default-style style:family="ruby"> > <style:ruby-properties > style:ruby-align="center" > style:ruby-position="below" > /> ... which is being ignored. Editing the provided example and changing the referencing element to <text:ruby text:style-name="Ru1"> and including a related (automatic) style definition: > <style:style style:name="Ru1" style:family="ruby"> > <style:ruby-properties > style:ruby-align="center" > style:ruby-position="below" > /> ... results in a working example[1], with the ruby text centred and positioned below the base text. Refer attached. It will need an expert to determine if the current implementation (using an automatic style) is appropriate or not. [1] This is the type of XML generated if the example is saved to ODT. Also note that I removed the original default (common) style definition. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
