https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=83145
--- Comment #10 from Owen Genat <owen.ge...@gmail.com> --- I am not sure that this report describes a problem LO can solve, for the reasons indicated in bug 68735. Comparing text as displayed in Writer vs Firefox is probably not an equal comparison. Here are some more metrics (using the C program kindly provided by Khaled) to add to those listed in comment two from that report: Hiragino Maru Gothic Pro Ascent = 880, Descent = 120, Leading = 500 MS Mincho Ascent = 859, Descent = 141, Leading = 0 Microsoft YaHei Ascent = 1058, Descent = 262, Leading = 0 Noto Sans T Chinese Ascent = 880, Descent = 120, Leading = 500 PMingLiU Ascent = 801, Descent = 200, Leading = 198 SimSun Ascent = 859, Descent = 141, Leading = 141 Source Han Sans Ascent = 880, Descent = 120, Leading = 500 WenQuanYi Zen Hei Ascent = 963, Descent = 297, Leading = 90 Liberation Serif Ascent = 891, Descent = 216, Leading = 43 These are the font versions I queried: Hiragino Maru Gothic Pro MacOS 10.6.8 OTF MS Mincho MS Office 2000 TTF v2.30 Microsoft YaHei Windows Vista TTF v5.00 Noto Sans T Chinese website OTF PMingLiU MS Office 2000 TTF v3.00 SimSun MS Office 2000 TTF v2.10 Source Han Sans website OTF WenQuanYi Zen Hei website TTC v0.9.46 Liberation Serif LOv4312 TTF v2.00.1 I think the variation in line height being observed is simply the result of varying metrics. In basic terms, older CJK fonts have a smaller Leading metric, while newer CJK fonts seem to have greater Leading metric (but other metrics are probably also influential). Ruby text does seem to affect line spacing, but this may be a separate issue. I am unclear about this, which is partly why I raised it above as an open question. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
