https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=85059

--- Comment #15 from Jay Philips <philip...@hotmail.com> ---
(In reply to Michael Meeks from comment #13)
> Oh fun - just get a few stack traces during the load; it'll show the problem
> nicely I guess; odd though - I don't see any huge changes in our automated
> performance testing, so ... at least our test files are still loading nice &
> quickly there =) then again - we limit the size of those.

The problem here wasnt really the size of the file, so doubt it would effect
any of the automated testing. ;D

> Seems to be spending a lot of time re-saving the embedded objects as ODF
> etc. and ... Hmm. not good.
> 
> Jay - I suspect that changing the defaults:
> 
> Tools->Options->Load/Save->Microsoft Office
> 
> around embedded objects [ we always convert them - otherwise they will not
> be editable ;-) - and I think AOO just leaves them as-is ].

Yes OpenOffice has these checkboxes unchecked and after unchecking them on LO,
the file opened in 10 to 20 seconds on Windows. But what seems strange is that
the file doesnt load on Windows with these checked, but loads on Linux with
them checked.

> This is a horrible false-dichotomy that shouldnt' exist; we should convert
> them as/when we need to on activation / macro use etc. but ... it is there.
> 
> Can you compare AOO with those options set.

With checking these options in AOO, the file loads in > 4 minutes on Linux.

> Also - is this really a regression ? some big files that have not been
> optimised are slow - that's not really news =)

Well as this change was introduced in the first release of LO, then i wouldnt
consider it a LO regression. :D

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to