https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70102
--- Comment #8 from Mirek2 <maz...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #7) > Is there really need to have two versions of icons, LTR and RTL? I have > never seen such an overkill, IMHO, and would rather attribute it to badly > designed icons if they don't fit in RTL - not mirrored. No, separate LTR and RTL versions are needed only for a few select icons -- those dependent on text direction. For example: undo, redo, (the new Tango icons use color to distinguish the two), superscript, subscript, bullets, numbering, and I'm sure there are some more, but it's not very many. > On the other hand it makes sense for the bullets. So why don't we prepare a > special icon set for RTL, i.e. put designers in charge and not the devs. It'd be very easy to do -- we just need devs to make it so that an RTL setting prefers icons suffixed with "_rtl" and doesn't flip any icons. It'd be good to get a list of the icons that LibreOffice currently flips, so that we have a list of RTL icons to make. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
