https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50916
--- Comment #30 from Gerry <gerry.trep...@googlemail.com> --- (In reply to Jouni Järvinen from comment #29) > Start from something. If it has to be a §for§ loop, then make it a §for§ > loop. Improve when you get better ideas. Something as slow as §for§ is > better than nothing at all. Someone like you should know it. The developer team has a clear understanding of the problems and potential solutions for the 1024 columns limit. So, I don't understand your point. The problem is that the solution entails a refactoring of (old, pre-LibreOffice) code. Lots of work. @Dennis Francis: Did you have time to look into the code related to the refactoring towards >1024 columns? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
