https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91925
Matthew Francis <fdb...@neosheffield.co.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fdb...@neosheffield.co.uk
Whiteboard|BibisectRequest perf |perf
--- Comment #3 from Matthew Francis <fdb...@neosheffield.co.uk> ---
Using the master dbgutil bibisect repo, I get 290-300s loading the attached
file with 2015-05-25, 26, 27, 28 and 08-20
I'm going to go out on a limb and suggest that the problem here is not
comparing like with like? There will be large differences in performance
between regular / debug / dbgutil builds.
Taking bibisectRequest off for now as there doesn't seem to be anything to see
using bibisect, but if the above is the case then this should be RESOLVED
NOTABUG
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
