https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=67544
jan iversen <j...@documentfoundation.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |NEEDINFO
--- Comment #14 from jan iversen <j...@documentfoundation.org> ---
(In reply to Chris Sherlock from comment #13)
> NEEDINFO should only be set if we need more information to diagnose or
> replicate the issue. Best not to use it if we just need to provide code
> pointers. Therefore setting status to NEW.
Well let me put it differently, it is only an EasyHack when we have code
pointers, so having it as "NEW" causes problems e.g. in our Wiki, because it is
shown as a ready to go EasyHack.
I opted not to remove the EASYHACK tag, because it would be confusing, but
setting NEEDINFO, with the clear comment asking for a code pointer, seems like
a good hint to the reporter.
we actually discussed this in ESC a while ago, and I am tasked with walking
through all EasyHacks and make sure they are valid with code pointers etc.
A new contributor actually NEEDINFO to be able to diagnose the problem (a code
pointeer), so seen from that perspective it cannot be wrong.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
