https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99152
V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO |NEW
--- Comment #6 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> ---
Thanks for rolling back and running the two installations and posting the log.
As you say typical that you did not have a repeat--these Windows installer
issues can be very annoying to pin down.
For what it is worth, if you look in the log at line #102073 there is an
"Executing op: SetTargetFolder(Folder=C:\Windows\fonts)" from there onward are
the control and operation sequences for the font installation.
Note that many show as "To be installed; Won't patch; No existing file" but
some are "Won't Overwrite; Won't patch; Existing file is of an equal version"
and also "Overwrite; Won't patch; New file versioned - existing file
unversioned" those continue through line #102409 -- the mix of CLSID GUID
registrations earlier coupled with these "op" lines detail specifics of what
happens with the fonts during install. Installing, patching, upgrading fonts.
A similar log can be captured during an uninstallation.
The patch done for bug 76239 (cmnt#66 & cmnt#35) refined the logic of using ref
counts for font replacement. Unfortunately to make any additional adjustments
to it we'd need solid log of things as the errant replacements/removals occur.
It has been very hard to catch it.
Which is why this should probably be linked to bug 76239 as a continuation if
not simply duped back to it and reopen. It is not yet 100% correct, but without
detailed log we're kind of stuck.
To my mind it is Andras's call about going forward here, or just adding to
76239
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
