https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=97269
--- Comment #14 from Bastián Díaz <diazbast...@openmailbox.org> ---
(In reply to Christian Lohmaier from comment #12)
> that has no relation to a portable version. You can install LO provided by
> TDF without dependency hell. If you already had LO, you can install update.
> Even if you never had LO installed, the baseline of TDF provided builds is
> so low that the requirements will always be met.
>
The list of reports for distribution would be too long to put here, but it is a
reality that LibreOffice maintainers can not always keep the last update for
dependency problems.
> Users in that case most definitely also *DON'T* want a portable version. As
> a portable version would come without any system integration, no startmenu
> items, no filetype associations.
> Please don't mix issues.
I think you should learn more ... do you know the technologies that have been
spoken here as a portable solution for LO?
Well, as much as Flatpak and AppImage not lose integration with the system.
Please, now you can easily test both:
• https://www.libreoffice.org/download/flatpak/
• https://bintray.com/probono/AppImages/LibreOffice/view
https://bintray.com/probono/AppImages/LibreOfficeDev/view
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
