https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=101956
--- Comment #13 from Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com> ---
(In reply to Alex Thurgood from comment #11)
> (In reply to Stephan Bergmann from comment #10)
> In bug 94716, comments 14 and 20 confirmed this.
bug 94716 comment 14 indeed looks like confirmation :)
bug 94716 comment 20 mentions "Oracle JDK 8.101", so probably ran into the
problem that LO didn't support JDKs with update version number > 99, fixed with
<https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=64d3270a89fd88d4d0cf70329af2c66f722fd95e>
"Related: tdf#101057 allow java update version number > 99"
> However, I have just tested removing the existing (and now outdated) JDK
> version I had on my MBPro OSX 10.9.5 machine, and installed the latest
> JDK8_u111. This was automatically detected by LO 5152.
>
> From comment 26, a second confirmation that the JDK is detected on OSX
> 10.9.5, so maybe we should close this now as WFM (I have no idea which, if
> any, commit fixed this).
Yes, I think closing as WFM would be best then.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
