https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103719
--- Comment #17 from Alex Thurgood <ipla...@yahoo.co.uk> ---
(In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #15)
> Alex: I think 5.1 is EOL indeed, I don't think there'll be an LO 5.1.7.
> If I well understood, there's no reproduction of this pb in 5.2 branch.
> Should it be WFM with target 5.2.2 ?
Hi Julien,
Indeed, no crashing in 5.2.1.2 (although I haven't tested 5.2.3 yet).
Even if I understand that 5.1.x is going to be EOL, I really hate how we can
release a "bug fix release" for an EOL branch that introduces a regression like
this - it really reflects poorly on the way we do things, especially as we
encourage people to upgrade to latest bug fixed release.
5.2.x is at the moment classed as "Fresh", whereas 5.1.x is "Still", and I
quote from the relevant web site page "LibreOffice Still is the stable version
that has undergone more testing (over a longer time)." This kind of marketing
speak clearly creates a mismatch between user expectations and the reality of
developing our code base.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
