https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103890
Terrence Enger <lo_b...@iseries-guru.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|bibisectRequest |bisected
CC| |fdb...@neosheffield.co.uk,
| |lo_b...@iseries-guru.com
--- Comment #6 from Terrence Enger <lo_b...@iseries-guru.com> ---
It seems to me that the qualification of cell references after
copy-and-paste is not clearly wrong. However, I note that if the
program has qualified cell references other than those is Sheet2.C1,
the other references remain qualified after <Undo><Undo>.
I have bibisected in the Linux 44max bibisect repository on
debian-sid; to summarize the results ...
commit s-h references after cut-and-paste
-------- -------- ------------------------------------------
feed1c07 52d21ee6 Sheet2.C1 and Sheet1.C2 unqualified
7c055d90 5e55d5ff Sheet2.C1 qualified, Sheet1.C2 unqualified
93992fcd 5b7920ee Sheet2.C1 qualified, Sheet1.C2 unqualified
1b5ce0c2 31abf4ce Sheet2.C1 and Sheet1.C2 qualified
Details coming soon.
I am removing keyword bibisectRequest and adding bisected, and I am
adding Matthew Francis to cc.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
