https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104028
V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |caol...@redhat.com,
| |noelgran...@gmail.com,
| |oliver.spe...@cib.de
--- Comment #18 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> ---
Using Inkscape 0.91 if I import the PDF and choose the Poppler based import,
portions of the image are lost--but if I use "native" Inkscape PDF import the
entire image is rendered including the center line and the arrowed lines coming
from "Object user 2"
So, in addition to Inkscape (when not using Poppler), I can confirm correct
rendering in the PDF viewer in both FireFox and Chrome--as well as the InFix
PDF editor and the TexWorks viewer all render the entire WMF, as extracted in
comment 4, when it is exported from LibreOffice 5.3.0 Draw or Writer or Impress
to PDF.
Also confirm that Adobe Reader 15/Acrobat Pro 9.5.5, Windows Explorer
(preview), MS Edge, MS PDF Reader, and the Imagmagick IMdisplay on Windows--and
likewise the Evince document viewer on Linux--all do not render the entire WMF
as exported to PDF. Dropping the dashed center line and several arrows pointing
from the "Object user 2" element.
So, the question is what are we doing wrong in our export filter for WMF
metafile that prevents some common PDF viewers from handling our PDF? Is our
export filter Poppler based?
The various print to PDF--OS or gs/ps based--all produce full representation of
the WMF in PDF, it is just our Export-to-PDF that is having the issue.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
