https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=105454

Miklos Vajna <vmik...@collabora.co.uk> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
           Keywords|                            |bibisected, bisected,
                   |                            |regression
                 CC|                            |khaledho...@eglug.org

--- Comment #1 from Miklos Vajna <vmik...@collabora.co.uk> ---
git bisect says:

- 9cb21a33421b8531dd25f76cc757f0d7f0fcc5ee is still good (2 lines)
- b8b0416620feecf3ede3305830a2b145c62a5bf9 is already bad (1 line)

It's not possible to bisect more between these two, as there is either no text
at all, or soffice crashes on startup (so there are 8 commits in the good..bad
range).

This is how I still bisected manually:

- check out fefd5116256e706ee1ab3d03e56cc0c2ff95305f, the last good commit
- cherry-pick 64fc186bb9cbb6af43d73149e9e593c48fbb0f22 "Remove unused
variables": crash
- cherry-pick f0393d7ff69011a16b100541ef18e5090544e4a1 "[harfbuzz] Fix text
width calculation, 3rd try": still good (2 lines)
- bff8fa97e16f0f06fddc5545ea36c8bd2b18a580 "Enable HarfBuzz by default":
already bad (1 line)

So I think this is a regression from bff8fa97e16f0f06fddc5545ea36c8bd2b18a580,
i.e. the commit that changed the icu layout to the harfbuzz layout.

Adding Cc: to Khaled Hosny

Khaled, do you have any idea if the new Common Sal Layout could be fixed to
handle this correctly? (Yes, I verified that the font in the document is not
missing from the system.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to