https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=94950
Xisco Faulí <xiscofa...@libreoffice.org> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords|bibisectRequest |bibisected, bisected
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution|--- |DUPLICATE
--- Comment #13 from Xisco Faulí <xiscofa...@libreoffice.org> ---
(In reply to Kevin Suo from comment #12)
> (In reply to Xisco Faulí from comment #11)
>
> Bibisecting using the "releases" repo suggests that libreoffice-3.3.0 is the
> first version the bug (i.e., the text position bug, not the image bug)
> appears.
>
> The text position shows correct in the "oldest" version (i.e., the
> OpenOffice.org version).
>
> Revise the version field accordingly.
>
> Further bibisecting needs the old old bibisect repo which I failed to
> download. Wondering if it is really needed?
I'm afraid that's not true. I've just bisected it with bisect-41max and it
pointed me to 8fe8bd6c3b5b1a539b7370f8c457fa69c061d2de which is the same as in
bug 80635
*** This bug has been marked as a duplicate of bug 80635 ***
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
