https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=42375
Heiko Tietze <tietze.he...@gmail.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |gautier.sop...@gmail.com
--- Comment #10 from Heiko Tietze <tietze.he...@gmail.com> ---
It's not only the row/rows issue. How plural is applied depends on languages.
In many languages it's n=0 for singular and n>0 plural but French, for
instance, has three forms (n=0, n=1, n>1) and Arab six different forms. The
typical solution is to take the number into account for localization [1].
The abbreviation in brackets is the second best solution. The plural form
depends in German on genus and loanword and can be (n/en), (r/er), (s), and
sometimes without any suffix. In this case it's simple with Spalte(n) and
Zeile(n) but there might be something like "<Row> (s/n/e/r)" in some languages.
On the other hand the (s) a quick and dirty solution that solves this problem.
So I'm not against.
@Sophie: What do you think?
[1] https://www.gnu.org/software/gettext/manual/html_node/Plural-forms.html
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
