https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=53869
--- Comment #8 from Roman Eisele <b...@eikota.de> 2012-08-21 17:22:07 UTC --- (In reply to comment #4) > I'm inclined to close this as WFM, worksforme, since you say it is now > working. > If you feel that this is incorrect, please re-open and provide more detailed > information. @Alex, @Rainer: I wonder what is the right way to proceed with this kind of bug. LibreOffice 3.6 is now working for the user, of course, but not because the bug just went away or was fixed, but because of a mere workaround (renaming the user profile). Under these circumstances, should we really mark the bug as RESOLVED|CLOSED WORKSFORME, or should we leave it open (at least for now) to make clear that the bug was not really fixed, but might need further investigation as part of our task bug 43489? No offence -- I just want to make sure that we handle this kind of bug in a consistent and useful way! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Libreoffice-bugs mailing list Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
