https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=46550
Jon Grossart <j...@grossart.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEEDINFO |UNCONFIRMED
Ever confirmed|1 |0
--- Comment #9 from Jon Grossart <j...@grossart.net> ---
I would point out that all but one of these bugs you point out were filed
literally years after my original report.
(In reply to Timur from comment #7)
> > Enhancement Request:
> > 1a) add something like Quick Styles for basic formatting styles
> I already noted Sidebar-Properties with "New Style" and "Update Style"
> buttons. And Thomas referenced Bug 90497.
There have been many improvements with previewing styles, but nothing nearly
along the lines of quick styles like MS Office (or document themes as described
in 90497, which is the same as basic idea).
> > or
> > 1b) add some what to actually see what you're going to be pulling in from an
> > import of styles or show the conflicts in stead of just "no overwrite" or
> > "overwrite"
> Not sure what this is, Bug 102002?
>
This newer request does seem to cover what I was mentioning -- finer grained
control of what's being pulled in, or least showing you what's actually being
pulled in that different from the current document.
> > 2) add a styles UI
> Bug 83362 and Bug
>
2i is not covered entirely. They've added showing the styles preview in the
pull down menu, but my original intent some sort of master style editor, so you
could see how it show you how it would look in a real document. The current
style preview still only really shows you font styling and not things like
margins/spacing/etc. Bug 37048 would be the closest one here for that.
2ii would be the one that is part of 83362. However, my overall point with this
is that there should be a better, more accurate preview for bullets and
numbers. It's gotten WAY better since 2012, but it's still got room to improve.
> > 3) change name of some of default styles
> Bug 37048 and Bug 47295.
Bug 47295 is probably the closest match.
>
> That's all best tested in master LO version. Currently it's 6.0+.
>
> This bug was put to New too soon. It's "negatively" titled: "Styles Editing
> is cumbersome and confusing" and it tackles different issues.
> Not only it's better to have "positively" titled bugs, but it helps focus on
> single issue that this this bug should be about.
> So if not closed because it's already somewhere in Bug 107326 or in bugs
> referenced here, this one should be renamed. Until then, I set to Needinfo.
None of those bugs you mentioned are even part of 107326, when they clearly
should be. I don't know who is supposed to edit those meta bugs.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
