https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=104020
--- Comment #12 from Stephan Bergmann <sberg...@redhat.com> ---
Hm, with the bibisect-win32-5.1 I can indeed reproduce that
> commit 98cd24c7e539d7ce0b1f2ae069926815e149d2b8
> Author: Norbert Thiebaud <nthieb...@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon Aug 31 07:30:22 2015 -0700
>
> source sha:e807dafa5ba9247479f925f96474d88d58450be9
>
> source sha:e807dafa5ba9247479f925f96474d88d58450be9
displays businesscard.odt wrongly, while its predecessor
> commit aef4f3dd8ca1c18078866e42a886c23f69704657
> Author: Norbert Thiebaud <nthieb...@gmail.com>
> Date: Mon Aug 31 05:18:00 2015 -0700
>
> source sha:c62ab814d8df19e16c82262093a350fac93d328d
>
> source sha:c62ab814d8df19e16c82262093a350fac93d328d
displays it correctly. (And c62ab814d8df19e16c82262093a350fac93d328d is indeed
the predecessor of e807dafa5ba9247479f925f96474d88d58450be9 in the core repo;
i.e., there's no commits in the bibisect repo that cover multiple core
commits.) However, when I revert e807dafa5ba9247479f925f96474d88d58450be9 on
recent LO master (also on Windows), businesscard.odt still displays wrongly
(which matches the impression that that commit looks good and rather unrelated
to the broken functionality). Something must be fishy with that bibisect repo.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
