https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=117878
Eike Rathke <er...@redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Hardware|x86-64 (AMD64) |All
Version|6.0.4.2 release |5.4.0.0.alpha0+
--- Comment #10 from Eike Rathke <er...@redhat.com> ---
I consider accepting invalid dates as wrong, but.. seems that odd roll-over
behaviour was for VBA "compatibility" (and for VBA mode it does work)? But then
again, why was 02-31 accepted but not 02-32 (which VBA apparently accepts)? I
suspect that was due to the dumb old algorithm.
So, do we want to accept any day (and month) number there and roll over? Or
should we restrict to the arbitrary previous margin values 1<=month<=12 and
1<=day<=31? Which IMHO does not make sense and I certainly would not accept any
complaint that suddenly also day 32 is accepted..
My take: do the full roll-over if that is what VBA does as well.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
