https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=118545
Buovjaga <todven...@suomi24.fi> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Ever confirmed|0 |1
CC| |caol...@redhat.com
OS|Windows (All) |All
Status|UNCONFIRMED |NEW
Keywords| |bibisected, bisected,
| |regression
Version|6.0.3.2 release |4.4.0.3 release
--- Comment #9 from Buovjaga <todven...@suomi24.fi> ---
(In reply to Donald Haase from comment #7)
> Almost invariably on opening the document, at least one footnote will be
> impacted.
>
> I just tested now opening and closing the document multiple times and see
> that (at least) footnotes 68, 87, 97 and many more are cut off (same issue
> as footnote 138 in the previously uploaded screenshot). I'll upload another
> screenshot to demonstrate.
Thanks. I bibisected with Linux 44max repo against the file opening situation
and got this blamed commit:
https://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=60d34e1c840d2c317bb7d0a5b14f4602c22b3fcc
coverity#735517 Logically dead code
its possible that this was the original intent, maybe
While testing, I always jumped to page 27 by finding the string
deuterocanonical and observed if footnote 68 was cropped.
The code the commit touched has since 2014 seen further renovations, so I
skipped trying to revert it to the original state.
Adding Cc: to Caolán McNamara
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug._______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
