https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=124710
--- Comment #8 from Winfried Donkers <winfrieddonk...@libreoffice.org> ---
(In reply to Eike Rathke from comment #6)
> Shortest reproducer:
>
> =IFS( 0, NA(), 1+0, "no idea")
I know what happens, but not yet why.
The raw stacktype for the arguments in ScInterpreter::ScIfs_MS() is
0 svDouble,
NA() svError,
1+0 svError,
"no idea" svString.
This is not influenced by reversing the stack.
ScInterpreter::ScIfs_MS() gives #N/A as result, which is not parameter NA(),
but the result of PushNA(), because of svError (1+0) is not popped and
evaluated.
I saw that the parameter parser (I don't know its proper term) parses 1+0 into
1, but have not yet found out if/when the raw stacktype for parameter (1+0)
changes into svError.
I keep on digging, but it may cost some time.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
