https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127633
--- Comment #12 from Eike Rathke <er...@redhat.com> ---
It would be yet another different reference syntax in the context of the
compiler lexicalizer and tokenizer/parser (and stringizer). Also clashes
between what now is a valid named expression like L1U1 and then suddenly
couldn't be anymore would have to be resolved. Certainly more to come..
Regarding "this is an open source project?", yes of course, provide a fully
working patch (preferably along with unit tests) and we could happily integrate
it. I personally won't invest my time on developing this. Specifically I also
don't see the need as the Excel R1C1 syntax does exactly that, just with the
slight inconvenience of having to type in the additional [] brackets for the
relative addressing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
