https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=127773
--- Comment #4 from Thomas Lendo <thomas.le...@gmail.com> ---
Tab 1:
Is this according to our HIG that the buttons are so wide? I don't like that
and that the buttons change their size if the user changes the size of the
dialog. Feels wrong as buttons normally don't change their size.
I'm undecided which version of this tab is most clear for me. The width of the
replace strings must not be as wide as the whole dialog, therefore I'm not
against the current implemented design.
Tab 2:
Looking at the second proposal, it feels not neatly (clear) arranged for me to
distinguish between the 2 columns. There are 2 Delete and 2 New buttons next to
each other. Not a perfect way to enhance UX.
Also the width of the 2 columns isn't the same but they should. Please never
make something in the UI depending on string length as we have many many
localizations with the same diversity of different string lengths. (Now it
looks like the column widths are the same as the English string lengths.)
Is there any possibility to have a better visible separation of the 2 columns?
In the current implementation, only the 'Autoinclude' checkboxes are looking
wrong. All other content is well arranged in respect of the space it needs (the
width of the fields must not be wider) and in a self-explanatory association of
the buttons to the right fields.
Tab 3:
(In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3)
> > Tab 3
> > - No Header cause it was the same than tab name
> I would go with headers even when it's the same as in the tab.
Hm, why wasting space when Andreas want to save space with his other changes?
Tab 5:
Really nice. Only the width of the button is something I want discuss.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
