https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=121963
--- Comment #27 from Steve <stevepattin...@hotmail.com> ---
Simple Questions / Feedback / Observations (please don't take offence):
* You have a stable version (6.2), so what is the purpose of something like the
6.3 version, with multiple releases. I can understand alpha/beta versions
being available whilst bugs/design issues are being addressed, but when you
remove those statuses and give it what appears to be a "released" version
nomenclature, then user expectation changes accordingly.
* This problem, which at first sight seems to be quite serious for those
afflicted by it, has been identified around 10 months ago. Given the previous
point, not having any feedback regarding ETA (or even if it is being looked at)
is disturbing. As I said, purely from a user's perspective, ver 6.3 looks like
a production version of LO. And therefore, I would also have an expectation
about having to revert as a result of inactivity, losing as a result, the slew
of excellent enhancements present in 6.3
regards, Steve
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
