https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=122881
--- Comment #31 from Buovjaga <todven...@suomi24.fi> ---
(In reply to Markus Elfring from comment #30)
> (In reply to Buovjaga from comment #29)
> > For this, we need the steps for how you created attachment 148519 [details]
>
> I disagree to this view because I find the available software documentation
> sufficient to some degree for the creation of a very simple test document.
>
>
> > It is strange that while avoiding enumerating the steps, you have written
> > many times more the amount of text that it would have taken you to write
> > those steps in the first place.
>
> I would like to see indications for a better understanding of information
> which I presented already.
No, no, no... this is not a competition, where bug analysers try to comprehend
how something was created. The rules are same for *everyone*: if you created a
document, you must be able to explain how you did it. You can disagree until
the end of the world, but you will go nowhere with such attitude.
Each time you respond like earlier, you effectively insult the volunteers who
want to help you. I find this utterly perplexing.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
