https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=91886
--- Comment #5 from Heiko Tietze <heiko.tie...@documentfoundation.org> ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #4)
> Making new extension category for fonts is absolutely wrong IMO: as
> mentioned, font management is OS feature, and those extensions would
> effectively create a duplicating font management mechanism.
Which is exactly my argument against shipping fonts that users cannot get rid
of. All those who don't care about compatibility, use own templates, don't want
the Noto overkill... IMHO the extension solution gives users more freedom.
My take:
Summary: "Make fonts extensionizable"
Hardware/platform: All
Blocks: <none>
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
