https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70659
--- Comment #13 from Julien Nabet <serval2...@yahoo.fr> ---
(In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #12)
> (In reply to Julien Nabet from comment #11)
> > It's not because SSD can contain several To that LO should become a kind of
> > bloatware.
>
> It's a strong statement. Increased capacity of hardware comes not to just
> give a warm feeling "I have it more than had yesterday". It helps solving
> real problems. And there *is* a real problem that I mentioned above, that
> *can* be solved using the increased capacity of modern hardware. Calling
> this "bloatware" is simply trying to use emotional arguments instead of
> technical.
Ok it was strong but it's because it's equivalent to tell me that every binary
should be built with libs in static so no need to bother about dynamic libs and
their versions. Yes it would work but your binaries become far bigger.
>
> And no, it's not about easier configuration: it's about *no* configuration
> for something.
In this case, the real problem is the lack of the configuration mechanism, so a
missing feature.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
