https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=86321
--- Comment #55 from matthewn...@yahoo.co.uk ---
(In reply to Lars Jødal from comment #47)
> Importance: I agree that trustworthy updating of plots is important,
> especially if you work with many plots. A few years ago, I used LO for my
> Ph.D. project, and it was huge problem to me that plots very often did not
> update - I did not know which plots I could trust, and there were a lot of
> them, so a workaround of moving all plot a few pixels each was very
> unattractive. (But yes, I kept using LO, and I am still a user.)
>
> Pinning it down: Like matthewnote writes, it is not an issue that is easy to
> pin down. I have mostly experienced it with many plots, something many users
> are not going to do.
>
> Status of the bug? I just tested matthewnote's sample file, attachment
> 165696 [details], using LO 7.0.1.2 on Win10. Interestingly, the plot does
> seem to update immediately (well, within a second), while I can confirm that
> the Y axis seem to prefer to start from 0 when autoscaling. However,
> matthewnote includes 7.0.1.2 among the tested versions that still has the
> bug. Can others reproduce the non-updata part of the bug with the 7.0.x line
> of LO? See description in comment 46.
>
> (If one day only the autoscaling problem is left, it is probably better to
> open a new bug about that problem, which should be much more simple to
> describe.)
>
> Version: 7.0.1.2 (x64)
> Build ID: 7cbcfc562f6eb6708b5ff7d7397325de9e764452
> CPU threads: 8; OS: Windows 10.0 Build 19041; UI render: Skia/Vulkan; VCL:
> win
> Locale: da-DK (da_DK); UI: da-DK
> Calc: threaded
Thankyou Lars for your observations. This week I'm putting off returning to
Cancer research (unpaid, as it often is) and investigating this Bug. I may
have a clue after unzipping the files and inspecting Object folders. There is
a difference and somewhere, Calc versions may decompress/infer objects
differently when opening. When saving, there are new additional folders which
I find in "working spreadsheets" (!) and find also a different
META-INF/manifest.xml manifest:version. (version 1.3 rather than 1.2). No
idea yet how a Calc version did that, yet willing to learn.
Would you have a moment to open again my attachment
http://bugs.documentfoundation.org/attachment.cgi?id=165696
check it's still working with you, save it with a new name using your Windows
Build and send it to me by email?
I've two Linux workstations here, no Windows.
Are you still on precisely the same LO Calc Version and Build? It may be one
of the few that gets this right.
By the way, I did consider virus (really!) and had the sample file scanned by
15 different virus scanners. All well there.
Hopefully yours
Matthew
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
