https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=135668
--- Comment #27 from Jim Raykowski <rayk...@gmail.com> ---
(In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #24)
> Created attachment 166751 [details]
> Two alternative ways to introduce enabling instructions
>
> Attached are two different ways to explain the instructions about how to
> enable Outline Content Visibility. As explained in the attached, one is
> more "dramatic" than the other.
>
> I would suggest a more dramatic version if you think users should made aware
> that it could be "dangerous" (in this case, such things as data loss,
> anchors lost, frame positioning changed).
>
> Or if you assess that people are not likely to "break" things, then let's
> use the less dramatic. I must trust your assessment here.
I think the less dramatic version is fine with an addition of (may be unstable)
which then would match the 'Enable experimental features (may be unstable)'
checkbox label.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
