https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=138124

--- Comment #7 from Justin L <jl...@mail.com> ---
Not sure what to think about this. It almost has to have exposed an existing
potential problem. The difference between 6.0 and now after jmux's adding the
stuff back in is that he exits from utext -> lcl_utext almost right away, while
before it processed the function to the end (and supposedly effectively did
nothing). But removing jmux's "return" and letting it process all the way
through doesn't "fix" the problem now.

The fact that this is a footnote problem is too much to just be coincidence, so
I believe the bisect and this must be a decent starting point, but I'm pretty
sure that there is nothing wrong with the commit itself.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs

Reply via email to