https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=134940
--- Comment #18 from Leandro Martín Drudi <sanipache...@outlook.com.ar> ---
(In reply to sdc.blanco from comment #12)
> (In reply to Leandro Martín Drudi from comment #11)
> Thanks for the explanation. You understand that this Bugzilla system is
> mostly to address specific problems with the software. If you want, you
> could make a enhancement request, where you make the suggestion that you
> gave in comment 9. That is, open a new bug report, and there is a label
> called Severity, that has the word "enhancement" in the drop-down box.
> Explain the confusion that arose with the >> -- it is possible that someone
> will be able to say a way to make an improvement to avoid this problem.
>
> But it is also possible that someone will say that this is explained in the
> documentation, for example:
> https://help.libreoffice.org/7.2/es/text/shared/01/06040400.html
> https://help.libreoffice.org/7.2/es/text/swriter/01/05150000.html
>
> and that an average user should also be willing to try to read a little.
> After all, it is also possible to turn off AutoCorrect completely.
>
> I am also an average user, not a developer. Sometimes it is just necessary
> to make some experiments and then try to find some help documentation. That
> is what I did in this case. I am not trying to persuade you of anything,
> just trying to show the possibilities where it might be possible to do
> something in relation to the concrete problem with <<.
You refer me to the help and believe me (I hope not to offend susceptibilities
with what I am going to say) but the help has only the name: it is half
translated, many things are outdated years ago, they give indications using
third things without instructing how to access them (for example: it says
"Insert an invisible space" but not how to insert it or a link to where it
teaches how to do it). The common user does not have the knowledge to do
everything that these answers propose because they barely understand.
I regret that this software is self-condemning for not listening to the users
but only to the egos of the programmers. They are repeating the history of
Linux where only a select group of experts has access and the common user ends
up using Windows because it does everything alone.
Either they simplify things to the end user or they will lose many new
potential users. I have been using LibreOffice for at least 12 years (I used
OpenOffice before) and I could never convince anyone to use it because of its
archaic interface and how difficult it is to do simple things like using an
autocorrect and have it work.
In the company where I work they never accepted to use LibreOffice because it
never ends up working well: always something vital fails, but they solve it in
the next update and in that one another vital thing breaks. And the worst thing
is that the solutions take too long and the loss of productivity is noticeable.
They should devote a whole full release to polish the code, fix all or most of
the bugs and then start adding. Otherwise it will never be "ready". At the end
of the day it seems like LibreOffice never got out of Beta.
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
