https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=79387
--- Comment #8 from Andreas Mantke <ma...@gmx.de> ---
(In reply to Buovjaga from comment #7)
> (In reply to Andreas Mantke from comment #6)
> > It's really disillusioned, if the only response from an open source project
> > on a bug report after nearly seven years is such a mass pinging.
>
> Is it really disillusioned, when experiments have shown that once-per-year
> re-testing typically results in 25% of the reports being closed as
> worksforme?
but if a source code in this area had never been touched by a developer after
the bug report, how would one expect that the bug had been gone? Self healing?
>
> > It seemed nobody has really touched this bug report during the last seven
> > years. This is particularly sad because the project pays staff for the work
> > on bug reports and this bug had been introduced by one of this persons.
>
> How do you know who introduced this bug? Do you have a commit id?
You are familiar with the structure of the LibreOffice source code as far as I
know. You are able to look at the area where this code live and are able to
read the source code. I'm not a LibreOffice coder (but I'm able to read the
commit history on e.g. Github).
Thus it is clear who introduced the code that causes the bug and made the
wizard feature unusable.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
