https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140476
--- Comment #7 from mwtjunkm...@gmail.com ---
(In reply to Telesto from comment #6)
> (In reply to Tomaz Vajngerl from comment #5)
> > (In reply to Telesto from comment #4)
> > > There is a 'common' aspect here.. set compression high.. and will usually
> > > get bad quality. The but you can define compression based on quality or by
> > > compression itself.. but well my take
> >
> > You don't get bad quality if you set compression to 0 as opposed to 9. You
> > get exactly the same quality for all compression levels.
>
> oops, PNG being lossless format.
>
> Why is compression that prominent; as it has so little influence. Why does
> same position in the dialog used for 'different things'
>
> Why doesn't the dialog show what the optimal compression level is.
>
> Similar story different program:
> https://www.howtogeek.com/203979/is-the-png-format-lossless-since-it-has-a-
> compression-parameter/
It's not about being optimal, it's about choice. Do I want my 16GB library of
PNG files to have the fastest load rate and least compression per image, or for
each image to take longer to load because their compression rates are high?
That's not a call anyone can make or should make for anyone else.
Personally, I go middle of the road, and the default compression rate of 6 in
LO is fine for me.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs
