https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=128956
Alex Thurgood <ipla...@tuta.io> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
Resolution|WONTFIX |---
--- Comment #9 from Alex Thurgood <ipla...@tuta.io> ---
(In reply to Timur from comment #8)
> This bug is Unconfirmed for too long.
> I don't use Mac but this is a general issue.
> I don't see a need for Lo to fix this, if exists, I guess profile is not
> meant to be shared across different versions.
> So I think this can be closed.
So you close the bug as WF, whilst not being a Mac user, and therefore not
being able to experience the bug in question ? Yes, that's entirely rational.
Please indicate where, in any ESC decision or QA decision, a bug should be
closed as WF because it has been in the UNCONFIRMED status for "too long".
Please point me to the definition of "too long".
The fact is, the project encourages people to test multiple versions and report
bugs.
Testing against an existing profile illustrates that there continue to be
issues when using a newer version against an existing profile, such as this
one.
It isn't a question of sharing the profile, it is a question of what happens
when a user installs an upgrade over an existing profile.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
_______________________________________________
Libreoffice-bugs mailing list
Libreoffice-bugs@lists.freedesktop.org
https://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice-bugs