https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=143181
--- Comment #9 from Tomaz Vajngerl <qui...@gmail.com> --- (In reply to stragu from comment #8) > > Thanks, Stuart. > Just one thought: if HTML is to disappear as an option, and given that PDF > gets a lot of criticism accessibility-wise, what would then remain for an > accessible export? A third-party extension that might not ever be created? I > am very new to how features are judged to belong to extensions or core, but > I don't think an accessible SVG (or whatever else accessible format) export > should be an optional extension that might or might not exist. > Am I missing something? HTML won't disappear as an option, just the wizard and other options besides the single-document HTML export. A good HTML5 export (not one that creates images of the slides and presents those in a html page) should still be implemented (IMHO), but is not a priority in any way. The current single-document HTML export is mainly used for indexing, that's why it is very basic, but anyone is free to work on it to make it more advanced. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
