https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=140561
V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu --- Comment #5 from V Stuart Foote <vstuart.fo...@utsa.edu> --- (In reply to Regina Henschel from comment #1) > Besides the wrong term, it should be considered to disable the position > field at all in case of "Mirrored" page layout. A position "Top" makes no > sense. A "Mirrored" page layout is designed to have the gutter always in the > middle, at the inside margins. No, it depends on intended binding -- a mirrored page would be left/right (inner reversed for LTR/RTL locale) OR top/bottom--mirroring is done when bound on either the vertical inner edge or across the horizontal top. Consider for example a ledger of landscape pages, or a wall calendar. When bound, the upper and lower pages need symmetrical/mirrored layout also. A binding gutter accommodates the print layout when bound. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.