https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=146150
--- Comment #11 from Caolán McNamara <caol...@redhat.com> --- (In reply to Mike Kaganski from comment #9) > Caolan: do you think it's reasonable to add such "UNO slot parameter" to > recognized syntaxes in impl_findSlotParam? I never really looked into it, but FWIW I see currently we have one private:factory/sdatabase?Interactive example and a private:factory/swriter/GlobalDocument variant along with, as far as I can see, only these other cases private:factory/simpress?slot=6686 private:factory/swriter?slot=21051 private:factory/swriter?slot=21052 private:factory/swriter?slot=21053 where the impress one is the old "start with wizard" case (I think) which we removed (or made non-default at one point). Though ironically we now have a new "pick template" dialog which is shown by default. And I think the writer ones are the "business card", "label", "xml form?") wizards or something like that. Maybe for those 4 cases we should follow the sdatabase case and just assign 4 "names" to these rather than replace it with an open-ended ?.uno:Command but I don't have any firm opinion there -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
