https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=147100

raal <r...@post.cz> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |caol...@redhat.com
           Keywords|bibisectRequest             |bibisected, bisected

--- Comment #4 from raal <r...@post.cz> ---
This seems to have begun at the below commit.
Adding Cc: to Caolán McNamara; Could you possibly take a look at this one?
Thanks

bdd0a608f23b1c4e54e3ec396e888cd40e2afa6f is the first bad commit
commit bdd0a608f23b1c4e54e3ec396e888cd40e2afa6f
Author: Matthew Francis <mjay.fran...@gmail.com>
Date:   Sun Mar 15 03:02:50 2015 +0800

    source-hash-705a8c226aee3e68db492083b7cf8b704335328b

    commit 705a8c226aee3e68db492083b7cf8b704335328b
    Author:     Caolán McNamara <caol...@redhat.com>
    AuthorDate: Tue Sep 23 20:35:50 2014 +0100
    Commit:     Caolán McNamara <caol...@redhat.com>
    CommitDate: Wed Sep 24 10:04:48 2014 +0100

        WW8PLCFMan::AdjustEnds deeply flawed concept wrt change tracking

        The whole idea of clipping the char attributes to before the cr that
word uses
        as the end of para marker is flawed from especially the perspective of
        redlining which is a char property in word.

        If the redline encompasses the newline in order to state that it is
deleted,
        then if the prop is clipped to before that newline then the end-of-para
doesn't
        get marked as deleted

        For now just remove the character attributes clipping from here to be
as
        conservative as possible.

        Hopefully the ordering of processing start pap before start chp and end
chp
        before end pap and the other million improvements in the parser that
came about
        after AdjustEnds was created avoids whatever problems were trying to be
worked
        around here.

        Change-Id: I5a72e462db2fff60f52b12c2125ea6ac363de695

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.

Reply via email to