https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=149360
Eyal Rozenberg <eyalr...@gmx.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Resolution|DUPLICATE |---
Status|RESOLVED |UNCONFIRMED
CC| |eyalr...@gmx.com,
| |rb.hensc...@t-online.de
--- Comment #5 from Eyal Rozenberg <eyalr...@gmx.com> ---
(In reply to Timur from comment #4)
> What you do is inflating number of bugs
I don't care about the number of bugs. I do care about there being an open bug
about outstanding issues. On the other hand, I could raise a similar question
about your motivation: Are you sure you are not rushing to mark dupes because
you disapprove of the number of bugs rising?
> without prior search
How do you know whether I've searched or not?
> or trying to understand what may or will not be done.
Not sure what you're talking about.
> DO NOT set Reopen when I or member of QA sets status.
Timur, I don't take orders from you.
The norm is, that confirmation (NEW status) requires acknowledgement/agreement
by others. But the question of whether bugs are duplicates of each other is a
matter for discussion.
> You may call someone else in CC if you disagree.
I will also do that; let's see what Regina says, for example. Or we could ask
Heiko to chime in.
But you should not mark bugs as duplicates without a convincing argument
regarding their being duplicates.
Again, I have no problem with this bug being marked a dupe if bug 92234 is
expanded to also regard Impress/Draw, and that would be perfectly fair, but you
should not try to make the issue "go away".
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
