https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=99912
--- Comment #15 from Mike Kaganski <mikekagan...@hotmail.com> --- (In reply to Stanislav Horacek from comment #14) > Just wondering - shouldn't be new duplicates closed in favor of the older > issues? Not always. > For instance, here we have information about regression and "not > bibisectable" which is missing in the new one. ... And in the other one there is > It was introduced in > https://git.libreoffice.org/core/+/062eaeffe7cb986255063bb9b0a5f3fb3fc8e34c > in 2011 (for version 3.6); then it was made optional in version 5.0 [1]. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
