https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=150973
--- Comment #7 from Hossein <hoss...@libreoffice.org> --- (In reply to V Stuart Foote from comment #4) > > Caolan recently fixed such a problem for > > Linux/gtk in tdf#144583. > > Could you please test with the latest LO master? > Uh, no he didn't. Status quo, the SVG would be converted to PNG directly > but not scaled. Exactly the reason the bundled PNG (optimized by the > graphics designer) for use at 100% unscaled UI. > > An SVG "converted"/"resampled" to PNG at the 16px/24px/32px resolution > needed by the unscaled UI, i.e. 100% will always look inferior to a directly > edited PNG at those sizes/scale. It is possible to have very low-res "16px/24px/32px" icons to use wherever needed, and rasterize SVG elsewhere. Btw, if the rasterization routines are problematic and produce low quality results, why not fix them to achieve better results? If the graphical back-ends can render SVG themselves, asking them to render would be much better. If that's what you meant by "direct use of SVG", I agree with you that it would be better. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
