https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=148777
--- Comment #6 from Mehrad Mahmoudian <m.mahmoud...@gmail.com> --- > we advertise freedom of choice. Suggesting FLOSS to people does not limit their choice. They can still use any proprietary tool under the sun (e.g Mendeley, RefWorks, EndNotes), but it is good to tell people that FLOSS tools do exist that does the same exact job (and even better). > Let me process this through the ESC. I'm not familiar with "ESC" acronym. Would you please clarify what does it stand for. > Proposal but no requisite is to go with two options The only viable options are Zoreto and Jabref. I have used both and JebRef seems to be good for those who only care about the citation and does not care much about keeping a record of the article itself. As far as I understand, Jabref is basically a very good front-end to a .bib file (in Zotero, user can highlight PDF, create notes and etc.). Regardless, if you would like to mention/suggest two FLOSS tools, Zoreto and Jabref are the most ideal. Sending people to Wikipedia is good, and it can also be added to aside Zoreto and Jabref. In the paragraph above, I used the term "viable" because of the following reasons: 1. Both software are actively under development 2. Both are cross-platform 3. Both are FLOSS (Free and Libre OpenSource Software) 4. Both have browser extensions 5. In both, the user owns their data and they can choose if they want to put it on the cloud or not. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
