https://bugs.documentfoundation.org/show_bug.cgi?id=151692
--- Comment #4 from Eyal Rozenberg <eyalr...@gmx.com> --- (In reply to Heiko Tietze from comment #3) > This topic has been reported multiple times now. And I still disagree with > less information (happy to help on bug 151377 with a collapsible section). That bug is about a different part of the animation side-bar, not the list of animation effects. > I also doubt that many users have very small screens and uses more than 10 > animations per slide so often. Users using animation effects have over 10 effects per slide quite often. Just a gradual entrance and a single transformation for, say, 4 objects gets you to 8. If you have a couple of paragraphs of text as well you're at 10 for just the appearance. But many many people's laptops aren't 1920-pixels tall. On my laptop, it's 768 pixels. > Thing is that you save the second line by adding the effect on the first. If > you drop the object type you rely on the naming (or get just numbers) and > putting the effect info behind makes the list hard to read and likely > overflow. You are right, in the sense that certain changes might be a disservice to some users, while for others, the compact lines are an absolute must. And that's exactly why the user should be able to _control_ what they see in the animation list. A one-size-fits-all solution is not the right choice here. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.
